So this "James Nicol"(which is an alias, btw), who's reco I find distasteful, in it's cavalier disregard for another human being, is the same "guy", who a while ago, had posted about me on this crap review board, lamenting how shocked and disturbed he was that I, as a non member of that site, could read material written on it. He added that stupid comment to a thread, now deleted, that was bashing me..... So when I saw another of his ignorant comments disguised as a review, it prompted me to write this blog.....

Here is a link to the reco thread, his reply is at the bottom, https://www.lyla.ch/topic/209006-cherry-love-ll-3178-%E2%80%A2-latino-%E2%80%A2-3178/

You may not find it as distasteful as I, but read through this blog, and perhaps my explanations will change your opinion, and perhaps they won't.....

 Most know how much I dislike the review board culture, and reviews/reco's in general. Everything about most reviews/reco's are indiscreet, unnecessary, of no general benefit, imo, and always subjective. Although I dislike All types of reviews/reco's, I have to accept that anyone has a right to post one, on a site that allows them, pertaining that the person being reviewed/recoed, allows them.  *But* it is also my opinion that anyone who adds unnecessary fodder to one, such as James has done, by stating, "there are far more beautiful local providers who provide better service".....is just playing to his preferred crowd, sucking up, being intentionally rude, and a bully. His opinion I hope, is taken with a grain of salt.

   For any client to state in any review, that there is better, more beautiful, sexier, etc, is unnecessary. It's just plain mean and so blantly subjective, it does no one any benefit, other than the authors ego..... Your "better" may be the next persons mediocre, etc... and if you are a decent person, don't you want to benefit people in this industry? If you did, you'd write things that are respectful to all, and generally helpful to all....examples- the escorts locale was easily accessible, had stairs/elevator, had parking, or not, was clean, or tidy, etc. The escort was representative of their pictures, was friendly, or not. Was punctual, easy to communicate with, or not, contacting them was easy, or not.They made you feel comfortable, or not, etc.... But bear in mind, some of these things too could be construed as subjective.... Your negative comments should be kept for those who are intentionally harming people!! This woman allowed James to be with her intimately, and he is now going to complain that she doesn't measure up to his other companions, and offers services which are restrictive?......Think about that!! How utterly immature and petty!!

  Were you aware that an escort will often restrict services when there is an issue with a clients hygiene, if the client is being a little to rough, if they can't seem to understand a no, or if there is no chemistry, etc, etc......bear that in mind!! I don't know of this person James recoed, so I've no horse in the race, other than to point out how he and others like him, who write such needless comments, are problematic to our industry. I believe that any guy who adds an opinion like James "type" of opinion, is being a bully, thoughtless, and rude, for no good reason. Sorry for being redundant....His type are what makes the review board culture so despicable. Stating petty things about an escort or their services doesn't benefit anyone and those petty things could harm the escort, so why say them? Why portray yourself as being a petty person, an asshole, or just another review board bully.

That particular board was at one time considered a recommendation board, which practiced the motto "if you've nothing nice to say, say nothing at all"....Some of it's decent members still follow that, but others, like James, seem to have forgotten it, or simply don't care to continue following that motto or to be decent or thoughtful person.

Some of you should understand, that for any escort, any type of negative comment can sometimes greatly affect their business. If you simply didn't find them as appealing as another, or their services as wonderful, just move on, as those are things are so very subjective, stating them doesn't benefit anyone. Unless an escort has deceived clients, robbed them, or played other harmful games, they don't deserve being negatively impacted by unnecessary comments, such as those written by James. Sorry to out you James, but you continue to speak like an asshole, so.....

To further explain why I'm so upset by all this..(and I'm speaking generally)...it is no easy task for some escorts to allow themselves to feel safe and secure, alone in a room, with a stranger. Then to allow that stranger intimate access to their body, is for some, foreboding. Yet they proceed, because they need that income. The escort tries very hard to make sure their clients are properly and fully serviced as promised, yet sometimes that can be difficult, for many reasons, which can often be contributed to the client. Then after all that, some escorts have to also deal with the negative impact stupid comments posted on stupid review boards have on their ability to make that income, along with the personal insecurities it may create for them...... So for any client to thinks it's appropriate to jump onto some stupid review board after a date on which nothing nefarious has happened, to write how he didn't get "enough" service (which is the same as saying restrictive service) Which is the same as saying "she didn't suck my dick long enough, or without a condom", or "she didn't allow me to finger her", or "fuck her ass", or "cum multiple times", or "fuck her in every position known to man", or didn't allow me to stick my tongue down her throat", etc, etc, because it's my personal experience that guys who typically complain about services being restrictive, usually want all, or most of the forementioned.......Then to also complain that the escort, who allowed him to see her naked, and allowed him access to her body, to penetrate her in some way, "wasn't as beautiful as others he's seen" is beyond indiscreet, immature, and petty!!......The cavalier ignorance with which people like James  displays is shameful! Can you not understand that some graciousness and gratitude should be given to anyone who'll accept some money in exchange for something so very personal?......Escorts aren't objects. We shouldn't be spoken about, or compared to one another, as if we are disposable or ratable. If you think we should be, if you don't see a problem with this, then your misogyny needs to be checked, and your attitude changed...